Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
Date: 2025-02-12 14:49:35
Message-ID: smyneb4dfp7mgf2g5dluee4jht26t474mxx5cs72dtybmjox3h@gfnzxo22mp6x
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I finally pushed this. The meson fix backpatched to 16.

I did some very minor polishing, reordering the OS lists to stay alphabetical,
instead of adding netbsd/openbsd somewhere to the front of lists.

Thanks for the patches!

Obviously not your fault, but I do think it's pretty crazy that with the same
available resources, netbsd and openbsd take considerably longer than linux
and freebsd, which both do a lot more (linux tests 32 and 64 bit with ubsan
with autoconf and asan with meson, freebsd tests a bunch of debugging
options). I wonder what is going wrong. I suspect we might be waiting for
the filesystem a lot, according to cirrus-ci's CPU usage graph we're not CPU
bound during the test phase. Or maybe they just scale badly.

Any chance you're interested in rebasing and expanding
https://postgr.es/m/20240413021221.hg53rvqlvldqh57i%40awork3.anarazel.de

It'd be nice if we could enable these tasks on cfbot, where we bring our own
compute, while leaving them on manual for everyone else.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-02-12 14:55:23 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-02-12 14:45:36 Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature