From: | Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: IDT timezone |
Date: | 2006-04-22 09:06:38 |
Message-ID: | slrne4jsgu.tl6.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2006-04-21, "Brandon Metcalf" <bmetcalf(at)nortel(dot)com> wrote:
> What is the best way to handle timestamps with a timezone of IDT? I
> see that I could modify src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c to support
> IDT, but what is the best solution?
>
> Basically, I have an application where I'm grabbing the timezone from
> the output of date(1) and appending that to a timestamp before I do an
> INSERT. In the situations where the timezone is IDT, the INSERT
> fails.
On reasonably up-to-date systems, why not use the %z format specifier for
date(1) to get a numeric zone offset?
Better yet, omit the offset entirely and make sure that the session timezone
is correctly set (to, presumably, 'Asia/Jerusalem') and let postgres figure
out whether DST is in effect (which it can do just as well as date(1) can,
provided you're keeping reasonably up to date - pg 8.0 onwards carry their
own copy of the standard zoneinfo database with them).
Zone names like 'IST' are in any event entirely ambiguous and should never
be used - you could regard it as a pure fluke that pg happens to resolve
'IST' as +0200 rather than +0530...
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-22 10:16:15 | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |
Previous Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2006-04-22 08:51:58 | Re: Unexplained lock creating table |