From: | Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString() |
Date: | 2006-02-26 18:37:46 |
Message-ID: | slrne03tbq.5md.andrew+nonews@atlantis.supernews.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2006-02-26, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> On 2006-02-20, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> > In further investigation, Akio Ishida found this kind of attack is
>> > possible even with EUC_JP/UTF-8.
>>
>> How?
>
> The details have been sent to cores.
I wasn't asking out of idle curiosity. Some preliminary investigation
that I have done suggests that when using UTF-8, the proposed changes
do not fix the problem (and may make matters worse). So I want to know
whether the problem that I'm looking at is the same thing as the one
you're looking at.
UTF-8 has the property that neither ' nor \ can appear as part of a
valid multibyte sequence. But many places in postgres are extremely
sloppy about handling _invalid_ utf-8, and unless you're prepared to
make the escape routine fail outright in such cases (which I would
strongly favour), it is likely that there will always be ways to get
malformed sequences into the backend (which itself is far too lax
about parsing them).
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-02-26 18:37:48 | Re: TOAST compression |
Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2006-02-26 18:36:01 | Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer? |