From: | Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals |
Date: | 2005-10-26 06:48:24 |
Message-ID: | slrndlu9lo.g61.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 2005-10-26, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Klint Gore <kg(at)kgb(dot)une(dot)edu(dot)au> writes:
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:41:54 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian
>> <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> test=> select
>>> test-> ('2005-10-30 13:22:00-05'::timestamptz -
>>> test(> '2005-10-29 13:22:00-04'::timestamptz);
>>> ?column?
>>> ----------
>>> 25:00:00
>>> (1 row)
>
>> Is that actually the correct answer?
>
> I'm of the opinion that the correct answer, or at least the usually
> desired answer, is "1 day".
Timestamp subtraction is not age(). Subtraction should be precise, age()
is allowed to justify.
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2005-10-26 07:02:39 | Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-26 05:56:01 | Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2005-10-26 07:02:32 | Re: memcpy SEGV on AIX 5.3 |
Previous Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2005-10-26 06:19:04 | Re: add_missing_from breaks existing views |