From: | Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: data on devel code perf dip |
Date: | 2005-08-12 01:44:18 |
Message-ID: | slrndfnvni.bj3.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 2005-08-12, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> In light of this, may I ask whether it makes sense to compare the
> performance of two runs with similar shared_buffer settings? With
> O_DIRECT, I understand from this manpage that the OS is going to do
> little or no page caching, so shared_buffers should be increased to
> account for this fact.
>
> Am I missing something?
O_DIRECT should only be being used for the WAL, not for buffer I/O.
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-12 01:44:53 | Re: data on devel code perf dip |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-12 01:40:39 | Re: data on devel code perf dip |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-12 01:44:53 | Re: data on devel code perf dip |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-12 01:40:39 | Re: data on devel code perf dip |