From: | manuel(at)sanyres(dot)es |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which Front End for Postgresql |
Date: | 2001-05-16 10:43:48 |
Message-ID: | slrn9g4j39.qk7.manuel@des01.sanyres.es |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
There is a Tcl/Tk frontend to PostgreSQL that is almost like Access.
http://www.flex.ro/pgqccess
For linux the best file system I've found is Reiserfs it is a journaling
file system and it is as stable as linux, you can even push the big red
button while the disk works and you'll find your disk intact when you
reboot.
It is fast adn reliable and best of all you can't break your file system.
http://www.reiserfs.com/
In article <20010516(dot)2590235(at)mis(dot)configured(dot)host>, Per-Olof Pettersson wrote:
> Hi
>
> PostgreSQL is not like eg Access for Windows.
> Access for windows has two parts.
> 1. The database engine
> 2. Application support/development/applications/dataview/query-windows...
>
> PostgreSQL is only 1. the Database engine.
> Though there is a command-line-based client "psql".
> And some administrative tools (also commandline) like initdb.
>
> As for the choice of filesystem.
> ext2 (which most linux use) has somewhat poorer performance on
> character-writing than eg UFS (which FreeBSD use) but I think the
> programmers on PostgreSQL have solved this with good caching and
> block-writing-routines ;-)
>
> Best of luck
> Per-Olof Pettersson
--
Manuel Cano Muñoz
------------------------------
SANYRES, S.A.
Director Dpto. Sistemas
manuel(at)sanyres(dot)com
manuel(at)sanyres(dot)es
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Al Frick | 2001-05-16 11:03:35 | Re: Which Front End for Postgresql |
Previous Message | manuel | 2001-05-16 09:29:37 | Form a field from two fields in a select |