Re: pg_dump return status..

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump return status..
Date: 2001-01-05 22:26:13
Message-ID: sizoh5y6t6.fsf@daffy.airs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) writes:

> An fprintf returning 0 is a suspicious event; it's easy to imagine
> cases where it makes sense, but I don't think I have ever coded one.
> Probably >N (where N is the smallest reasonable output, defaulting
> to 1) may be a better test in real code.

On older systems fprintf returns 0 on success and EOF on failure.

> As I recall, on SunOS 4 the printf()s don't return the number of
> characters written. I don't recall what they do instead, and have
> no access to such machines any more.

Probably 0/EOF. sprintf on SunOS returns its first argument.

Ian

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-05 23:01:48 Re: SHM ids (was running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2)
Previous Message Uro Gruber 2001-01-05 22:17:29 PHP and PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2001-01-05 22:28:07 bootstrap tables
Previous Message Nathan Myers 2001-01-05 22:17:09 Re: pg_dump return status..