From: | "Ian Harding" <ianh(at)tpchd(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-05 20:02:54 |
Message-ID: | sd259940.049@mail.tpchd.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
It is not intuitive. It is like pronouncing MySQL "mice -Q -L"
>>> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> 07/05/02 06:05AM >>>
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> At some point, we may have to modify our name and start at 1.0 again.
>
> > Ya, that's it ... we've only spent, what, 8 years now making 'PostgreSQL'
> > known, so let's change the name *just* so that we can start at 1.0 and
> > face a new challenge of getting ppl to recognize the name?
>
> I've heard a number of people opine that we should go back to just plain
> 'Postgres', which is pronounceable by the uninitiate, and besides which
I can never figure this out ... what is so difficult about 'Postgres-Q-L'?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-07-05 20:06:09 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-05 18:59:45 | Re: (A) native Windows port |