From: | "Dale Anderson" <danderso(at)crystalsugar(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Platform comparison ... |
Date: | 2002-03-18 21:53:42 |
Message-ID: | sc960d92.091@NGW-1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Group,
I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and good solid technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using Microsoft SQL Server. Right now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-end for some of our web stuff. A couple of our developers, which are Microsoft VB developers, are complaining about not being able to use proprietary MS stuff with PostgreSQL. I have told them to use standard SQL92 compliant programming techniques, and all will work just fine. They just don't seem to understand why a person wouldn't use SQL Server. If I could put together a list of good solid technical arguments, (Performance, Support, Reliability, ETC.), as to why PostgreSQL is better, I think I can make a good case in keeping PostreSQL. I just don't have any SQL Server experience to compare with. If any of you, who have SQL Server experience could send me good technical comparisons of SQL Server vs PostgreSQL, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks in advance,
Dale Anderson.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2002-03-18 22:16:17 | Re: Platform comparison ... |
Previous Message | Robert E. Bruccoleri | 2002-03-18 21:04:02 | Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix |