From: | "Dale Anderson" <danderso(at)crystalsugar(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
Date: | 2000-07-20 21:19:25 |
Message-ID: | s97726a0.002@crystalsugar.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes, we all know that any 1 filesystem can be over 2GB.....I have one that is 7GB. What he is asking is can any 1 FILE be large that 2GB???????????????????
>>> Erich <hh(at)cyberpass(dot)net> 07/20/00 04:05PM >>>
> Even on Linux? I'm studying a database project where the raw data is 10 to 20
> Gb (it will be in several tables in the same database). Linux has a limit of 2
> Gb for a file (even on 64-bits machine, if I'm correct). A colleague told me
Quoi?
On my RedHat6.2 system:
/dev/md0 14111856 257828 13137168 2% /raid
> to use NetBSD instead, because PostgreSQL on a Linux machine cannot host more
> than 2 Gb per database. Any practical experience? (I'm not interested in "It
> should work".)
For a heavy-duty server, I would probably pick OpenBSD over Linux, but
both will work fine, and both can have filesystems far larger than
2gb.
e
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Earl | 2000-07-20 21:19:56 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
Previous Message | Erich | 2000-07-20 21:05:39 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |