Re: Migration Postgresql

From: Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com>
To: ALEXANDER JOSE <aangelj(at)hotmail(dot)com>, postgres admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Migration Postgresql
Date: 2014-04-04 02:38:54
Message-ID: s6iy5f6qusdcm6x284ac14gs.1396579128137@email.android.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

PG9 and upwards all provide a sort of HA with replication available. I would recommend the latest 9.2 (9.2.8 I believe) or the latest 9.3 (if you need the 9.3 features). One advantage of 9.2 is that it's a little older and a little more tried-and-true, BUT THAT IS JUST MY OPINION (before I get flamed). Cascading replication works very nicely. In any event, you will likely want to do the pg_dump/restore dance on a new system with a new cluster rather than an in-place upgrade.

The replication stuff is well-documented and pretty simple.

If you have further questions, either let us know your specifics here, or email me directly, and I would be happy to advise. I danced this dance over 50 times in testing for our 8x -> 9x upgrade and another 20 or so for my SSD migration.

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: ALEXANDER JOSE <aangelj(at)hotmail(dot)com> </div><div>Date:04/03/2014 8:28 PM (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: postgres admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> </div><div>Subject: [ADMIN] Migration Postgresql </div><div>
</div>I would like to help and I'm going to migrate postgresql version 9.0.4 to a higher, 9.3, which is the most stable?

High availability to place 2 postgresql servers, which would be the best settings to provide active active nodes.

alexander
DBA Postgresql

Venezuela

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Romero Benavides 2014-04-04 03:31:25 Slow down the server artificially in order to reduce transactional memory activity
Previous Message ALEXANDER JOSE 2014-04-04 01:26:11 Migration Postgresql