From: | Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | ALEXANDER JOSE <aangelj(at)hotmail(dot)com>, postgres admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Migration Postgresql |
Date: | 2014-04-04 02:38:54 |
Message-ID: | s6iy5f6qusdcm6x284ac14gs.1396579128137@email.android.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
PG9 and upwards all provide a sort of HA with replication available. I would recommend the latest 9.2 (9.2.8 I believe) or the latest 9.3 (if you need the 9.3 features). One advantage of 9.2 is that it's a little older and a little more tried-and-true, BUT THAT IS JUST MY OPINION (before I get flamed). Cascading replication works very nicely. In any event, you will likely want to do the pg_dump/restore dance on a new system with a new cluster rather than an in-place upgrade.
The replication stuff is well-documented and pretty simple.
If you have further questions, either let us know your specifics here, or email me directly, and I would be happy to advise. I danced this dance over 50 times in testing for our 8x -> 9x upgrade and another 20 or so for my SSD migration.
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: ALEXANDER JOSE <aangelj(at)hotmail(dot)com> </div><div>Date:04/03/2014 8:28 PM (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: postgres admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> </div><div>Subject: [ADMIN] Migration Postgresql </div><div>
</div>I would like to help and I'm going to migrate postgresql version 9.0.4 to a higher, 9.3, which is the most stable?
High availability to place 2 postgresql servers, which would be the best settings to provide active active nodes.
alexander
DBA Postgresql
Venezuela
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rene Romero Benavides | 2014-04-04 03:31:25 | Slow down the server artificially in order to reduce transactional memory activity |
Previous Message | ALEXANDER JOSE | 2014-04-04 01:26:11 | Migration Postgresql |