| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Date: | 2010-04-23 23:07:15 |
| Message-ID: | s2y603c8f071004231607jf4468c06y185817dc274e0c9e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> >
>> > 99% of transactions happen in similar times between primary and standby,
>> > everything dragged down by rare but severe spikes.
>> >
>> > We're looking for something that would delay something that normally
>> > takes <0.1ms into something that takes >100ms, yet does eventually
>> > return. That looks like a severe resource contention issue.
>>
>> Wow. Good detective work.
>
> While we haven't fully established the source of those problems, I am
> now happy that these test results don't present any reason to avoid
> commiting the main patch tested by Erik (not the smaller additional one
> I sent). I expect to commit that on Sunday.
Both Heikki and I objected to that patch. And apparently it doesn't
fix the problem, either. So, -1 from me.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-23 23:07:20 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-23 23:04:21 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |