Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders
Date: 2010-04-01 09:21:03
Message-ID: s2rbddc86151004010221ld585befar76724e910bca6fe6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1 April 2010 01:51, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > [patch]
>
> As a general rule, I really appreciate people being willing to take
> the time to put proposed changes into patch form, even if they're
> small, but this three-line patch contains two bugs. :-(
>
> Thanks for your many typo corrections, though!
>
> ...Robert
>

Or my changes were so good, the world wasn't ready for it? Yes, I think
that was it.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-04-01 10:01:55 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.1 - Release Theme
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2010-04-01 09:12:35 Re: Feature request - function-based deferrable uniques.