Re: SQL Functions

From: "Raymond Auge" <RX_Auge(at)nickel(dot)laurentian(dot)ca>
To: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <postgres(at)productivitymedia(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL Functions
Date: 2004-10-19 15:38:38
Message-ID: s174fcdc.066@luadmn2.laurentian.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hello Postgres User,

I'd have to say that functions have the same "function" in SQL as they do in any language; a logical grouping of often repeated opperations.

So, if you have a repeated sequence like

query1(args);
if(result of query1 does this){
query2(args);
}
else{
query3(args);
}

then consider that you have 3 transactions with the database.

But, if all that was put into a SQL function, you have 1 transaction; "functions in SQL are atomic".

As well, in you code you have

sql_function(args);

and that's it...

clean and very fast.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond Augé, B.COSC
Spécialiste en médiatisation de la formation/Multimedia specialist
Université Laurentienne / Laurentian University
<rx_auge(at)laurentienne(dot)ca> / <rx_auge(at)laurentian(dot)ca>
(705) 675-1151 x3934

>>> Postgres User <postgres(at)productivitymedia(dot)com> 19/10/2004 11:12:47 am >>>
What are the advantages to SQL Functions? I'm looking to optimize
'default' PostgreSQL environments for clients. I'm writing an
application and looking to put functions to optimize just that table,
etc. They don't want to have a full-time database admin (surprise!).

Thanks,
J

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-19 15:51:21 Re: postmaster stopps
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-10-19 15:28:46 Re: postmaster stopps