Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist)

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist)
Date: 2003-08-21 22:24:39
Message-ID: rahakv899jgjhtvl6qd638v85sr5tj2bf5@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:56:02 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
>Conceivably it could be a win, though,
>if you could do frequent "vacuum decent"s and only a full-scan vacuum
>once in awhile (once a day maybe).

That's what I had in mind; similar to the current situation where you
can avoid expensive VACUUM FULL by doing lazy VACUUM frequently
enough.

Servus
Manfred

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Boonzaaier 2003-08-21 22:27:02 Re: Bulk Insert / Update / Delete
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-21 21:56:02 Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-08-21 22:46:20 Re: Buglist
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-21 22:17:55 Re: [SQL] "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b