From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) |
Date: | 2003-08-21 22:24:39 |
Message-ID: | rahakv899jgjhtvl6qd638v85sr5tj2bf5@4ax.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:56:02 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
>Conceivably it could be a win, though,
>if you could do frequent "vacuum decent"s and only a full-scan vacuum
>once in awhile (once a day maybe).
That's what I had in mind; similar to the current situation where you
can avoid expensive VACUUM FULL by doing lazy VACUUM frequently
enough.
Servus
Manfred
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Boonzaaier | 2003-08-21 22:27:02 | Re: Bulk Insert / Update / Delete |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-21 21:56:02 | Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-08-21 22:46:20 | Re: Buglist |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-21 22:17:55 | Re: [SQL] "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b |