| From: | George Neuner <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: browser interface to forums please? |
| Date: | 2017-04-06 01:40:06 |
| Message-ID: | r56bect3j8gsmnavhifbl3s6e3h91kbcht@4ax.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:44:55 -0700, "David G. Johnston"
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>A mailing list configuration that will automatically add on the OP to any
>email in a message thread lacking the OP would work-around those list
>respondents who would use "Reply" instead of "Reply All". Keeping track of
>all respondents and adding them would be something to consider as well.
>
>The above would address the problem of our inability to provide a limited
>engagement channel for people seeking help without forcing them onto the
>-bugs list.
That seems like a good idea. But having no experience with mailing
list administration or available software, I don't know how easy it
would be to implement.
>A second problem is how to easily allow people to join (both read-only and
>read-write) an ongoing conversation that isn't in their inbox. Asking for
>a "forum" seems to be expressing a problem of this nature. I'm deferring
>consideration of this problem-area for some other time.
That's [partly] what digest mailings are for ... to alert people to
interesting discussions they aren't following. Unfortunately, most
lists don't provide digests by default.
George
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | rob stone | 2017-04-06 03:03:15 | A change in the Debian install |
| Previous Message | Lisandro | 2017-04-05 23:33:25 | Re: Is this pgbouncer configuration suitable for a production environment with hundreds of databases? |