| From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: HEAP_MOVED_IN or HEAP_MOVED_OFF? |
| Date: | 2002-07-18 14:56:35 |
| Message-ID: | r3ldjuctme2ipnimoe3kr8nkr02sof8n2s@4ax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 23:05:05 +0900 (JST), Tatsuo Ishii
<t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>TRAP: Failed Assertion("!(!((tp.t_data)->t_infomask & (0x4000 |
>0x8000))):", File: "heapam.c", Line: 1315)
Tatsuo, this is unrelated to *your* work. It is a bug introduced with
my heap tuple header changes. Tom Lane has reported this bug three
days ago: "[HACKERS] HeapTuple header changes cause core dumps in CVS
tip".
A workaround has been posted in reply to this message. And a (IMHO)
better fix is waiting on -patches, making the workaround obsolete. If
you try the fix: any feedback is very appreciated.
Servus
Manfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-07-18 15:05:32 | regression in CVS HEAD |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-18 14:24:28 | Re: HEAP_MOVED_IN or HEAP_MOVED_OFF? |