Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Date: 2025-03-17 18:54:59
Message-ID: qr2bjfd7sxrnear442kc3fkdghgmojaex6nq7kdoh67oybrjca@mpnbn2b55zi2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-03-17 14:52:02 -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I don't feel strongly that we need to be as rigorous for
> maintenance_io_concurrency, but I'm also not sure 160 seems reasonable
> (which would be the same ratio as before).

I'd lean towards just setting them to the same value for now.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-03-17 19:05:42 Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Previous Message Matheus Alcantara 2025-03-17 18:54:08 Re: dblink: Add SCRAM pass-through authentication