Re: Postgres-XL

From: SQL Padawan <sql_padawan(at)protonmail(dot)com>
To: Mladen Gogala <gogala(dot)mladen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres-XL
Date: 2021-11-27 17:01:34
Message-ID: q9DvtybQAonhSeVR1AOI9pFP7hVRRk93mEd_s-RXht7HdtGAUHrK7KRU7Bbil3jSN0sD1vR9g9kVe4SUKtE6whhofj-vG-4o5A5tMh_WaCs=@protonmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin


On Wednesday, November 24th, 2021 at 21:51, Mladen Gogala <gogala(dot)mladen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Postgres-XL is not exactly a replication solution but it is ACID compliant and it doesn't have problem with sequences. It is a decent high availability solution. More information is available here: https://www.postgres-xl.org/

It hasn't moved in almost 3 years? A Marie-Céleste project?

SQLP!

> Mladen Gogala

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2021-11-27 17:12:52 Re: Postgres-XL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-26 19:44:29 Re: What do you do with a long running rollback