From: | Mark Vantzelfde <netmasters(dot)ma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on Windows |
Date: | 2010-04-01 17:51:53 |
Message-ID: | q2zd04aa01f1004011051wab8352a7yae305a7b52d596b7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Could it be that pg_ctl uses some sort of unix cmd like ps to try to
determine with the postgres processes are running? Using ps from a windows
command prompt does not show the postgres processes started as services.
Mark
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Mark Vantzelfde <netmasters(dot)ma(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> Same result.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
>
>> On 29/03/2010 18:38, Mark Vantzelfde wrote:
>> > I am running 8.4 on a Windows Vista system. The software was installed
>> using
>> > the auto-install process. PostgreSQL starts successfully as a service
>> when
>> > the system boots. The running postgres* processes can be verified via
>> Task
>> > Manager. I can run psql from the command prompt. I have the PGDATA env
>> > variable set to the folder where the PostgreSQL data sits. Running the
>> > pg_ctl status command from the command prompt returns "pg_ctl: no server
>> > running". Ideas why pg_ctl doesn't know about the running services?
>>
>> Have you tried running it with the -D option instead of the env
>> variable? No idea if it will make any difference...just a wild guess.
>>
>> Ray.
>>
>> --
>> Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland
>> rod(at)iol(dot)ie
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark Vantzelfde
> NetMasters, Inc.
>
--
Mark Vantzelfde
NetMasters, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brad Nicholson | 2010-04-01 18:41:14 | Lifekeeper |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2010-04-01 17:25:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.1 - Release Theme |