From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items |
Date: | 2010-04-08 10:58:39 |
Message-ID: | q2o603c8f071004080358mbb01b226ne2e435422608c80f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> OK, that looks a lot less risky than I had understood from discussions.
>>> The main thing for me is it doesn't interfere with Startup or
>>> WalReceiver, so assuming it works I've got no objections. Thanks for
>>> chasing this down, good addition.
>>
>> Thanks. Committed.
>
> Thanks. The following TODO item should be removed?
>
> "Redefine smart shutdown in standby mode to exist as soon as all
> read-only connections are gone."
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Standby_server_mode
>
> Or change it to something like?
>
> "Change smart shutdown in standby mode so that it kills the startup
> and walreceiver process before waiting for the regular backends to die off"
Yeah, we should do one of those two things, but I don't much care which.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-04-08 11:05:11 | Re: Feature request: limited deletions |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-08 10:57:16 | Re: A maze of twisty mailing lists all the same |