From: | Harald Fuchs <hf0731x(at)protecting(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Best approach for a "gap-less" sequence |
Date: | 2006-08-14 16:21:36 |
Message-ID: | pufyfzffu7.fsf@srv.protecting.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In article <878xlrwcxm(dot)fsf(at)gmail(dot)com>,
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> AgentM <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> writes:
>> Since the gapless numbers are purely for the benefit of the tax people, you
>> could build your db with regular sequences as primary keys and then regularly
>> (or just before tax-time) insert into a table which maps the gapless sequence
>> to the real primary key.
> That's also an interesting approach. An auxiliary table like
> transaction integer FK to the transactions table
> transaction_nb integer gapless sequence
> should do it. A trigger inserting on this auxiliary table would also take
> care of everything... If I have an after trigger I believe I wouldn't need
> any locking... I have to think about this...
Why putting gapless numbers into the database at all? Just calculate them at
query time.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2006-08-14 16:28:36 | Re: Best approach for a "gap-less" sequence |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-08-14 16:16:09 | Re: Migrating PostgreSQL database to MySQL/MS Access |