Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Harald Fuchs <nospam(at)sap(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-09 11:33:39
Message-ID: pu1xtmve5o.fsf@srv.protecting.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In article <20031009061602(dot)GB8513(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>,
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> writes:

> BTW, MySQL versions without transactions are unusable for 365/7/24
> systems, because you cannot make backup of DB without transaction or
> redo log.

Huh? People have backed up their MyISAM tables with "mysqlhotcopy" or
something like that for ages. This tool locks all tables and can take
a significant amount of time for large databases. Since many people
don't want that, they just create a small replication slave used
exclusively for backup.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2003-10-09 11:45:38 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Previous Message Harald Fuchs 2003-10-09 11:28:29 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)