In article <20090816122526(dot)GW5407(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>,
Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> writes:
> I've just had a look and PG does actually seem to be returning values as
> I'd expect, i.e. 0 <= n < 1.
That's what everyone would expect. If it's really implemented like
that the documentation is wrong, isn't it?