Re: CSVQL? CSV SQL? tab-separated table I/O? RENAME COLUMN

From: George Neuner <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CSVQL? CSV SQL? tab-separated table I/O? RENAME COLUMN
Date: 2018-05-04 20:03:52
Message-ID: ppdpedh8bl8htjppf7oqiihu2rvlklh8pg@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 3 May 2018 11:02:00 -0700, Adrian Klaver
<adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:

>On 05/03/2018 09:47 AM, George Neuner wrote:
>>
>> ..., I would not discount the possibility that Microsoft really
>> has patented some variation of CSV. They absolutely did *try* to
>> copyright the use of + and - symbols for specifying addition and
>> subtraction operations in VisualBASIC.
>
>Not seeing it:
>
>http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=microsoft&FIELD1=AANM&co1=AND&TERM2=csv&FIELD2=&d=PTXT

That's the patent database. Microsoft tried to get a *copyright*. I
don't recall whether it was granted [I don't believe it was], and this
would have been circa ~1990, so it's hard to search for in any case.
Unlike the patent database, the copyright database does not contain
the protected material - it only gives archival references to it.

It generated quite a bit of negative press coverage at the time. The
basis of Microsoft's argument was that "x + y" was a unique and
protectable expression of the addition concept because it could have
been done in other ways, e.g., by "add(x,y)".

George

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2018-05-04 20:22:32 Re: How to find the hits on the databases and tables in Postgres
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2018-05-04 18:36:43 Re: How to find the hits on the databases and tables in Postgres