From: | Gael Le Mignot <gael(at)pilotsystems(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Memory usage of auto-vacuum |
Date: | 2011-07-09 08:39:30 |
Message-ID: | plop87pqljn8zh.fsf@aoskar.kilobug.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello Craig!
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 16:31:47 +0800, you wrote:
> On 9/07/2011 3:25 PM, Gael Le Mignot wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are running a PostgreSQL 8.4 database, with two tables containing a
>> lot (> 1 million) moderatly small rows. It contains some btree indexes,
>> and one of the two tables contains a gin full-text index.
>>
>> We noticed that the autovacuum process tend to use a lot of memory,
>> bumping the postgres process near 1Gb while it's running.
> What is maintenance_work_mem set to in postgresql.conf?
It's the debian default, which is 16Mb. Do you think we should reduce it ?
I also forgot to add something which may be important : there are a lot
of INSERT (and SELECT) in those tables, but very few UPDATE/DELETE.
Regards,
--
Gaël Le Mignot - gael(at)pilotsystems(dot)net
Pilot Systems - 9, rue Desargues - 75011 Paris
Tel : +33 1 44 53 05 55 - www.pilotsystems.net
Gérez vos contacts et vos newsletters : www.cockpit-mailing.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gael Le Mignot | 2011-07-09 08:43:23 | Re: Memory usage of auto-vacuum |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-07-09 08:33:03 | Re: Memory usage of auto-vacuum |