| From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance efficiency |
| Date: | 2010-04-29 09:29:36 |
| Message-ID: | p2q3eff28921004290229v6c7c2420vf863a32e51a95d21@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/4/26 Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>:
> 2010/4/26 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
>> Vincenzo Romano wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering how efficient the inheritance can be.
>>> I'm using the constraint exclusion feature and for each child table
>>> (maybe but one) I have a proper CHECK constraint.
>>> How efficient can the query planner be in choosing the right child
>>> tables in the case of, say, thousands of them?
>>> Would the selection process behave linearly, logarithmically or what?
>>
>> It is fine for dozens of child tables, but not thousands; it does need
>> improvement.
>
> This sounds like "linear" algorithms. Doesn't it?
>
>>> And now it comes to my mind the same question for partial indexes.
>>> That is, if I had a lot (really a lot) of small partial indexes over a
>>> very large table, how efficient can the query planner be
>>> in selecting the right indexes?
>
> No info about this point (partial indexes)?
> Is also this geared with linear algorithms ?
Should I move to an "enterprise grade" version of PostgreSQL?
--
Vincenzo Romano
NotOrAnd Information Technologies
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A.Bhattacharya | 2010-04-29 09:52:19 | Java Memory Issue while Loading Postgres library |
| Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2010-04-29 09:19:52 | Re: [SPAM] Re: Best way to replicate to large number of nodes |