From: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Kerberos IV Support Broken? |
Date: | 2003-04-04 20:07:54 |
Message-ID: | p0511170fbab395fe3bd0@[137.78.212.225] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
At 1:45 PM -0500 4/4/03, Tom Lane wrote:
>"Henry B. Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> writes:
>> Or has everyone just abandoned K4 and we should forget about it?
>
>It's entirely possible that you're the only one using K4 with PG;
>I can't recall having heard from anyone else recently. If it's
>broken, send us patches ...
If I do patching I'll send patches. I didn't want to install K5 on
this machine when K4 is already there and the KDC I'm using supports
K4.
--
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry(dot)B(dot)Hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-04-04 23:55:58 | Re: Kerberos IV Support Broken? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-04 18:45:38 | Re: Kerberos IV Support Broken? |