From: | Seum-Lim Gan <slgan(at)lucent(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Performance, vacuum and reclaiming space, fsm |
Date: | 2003-10-13 09:12:27 |
Message-ID: | p05100301bbb01a5b6576@[192.168.10.43] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
I did a search in the discussion lists and found several
pointers about setting the max_fsm_relations and pages.
I have a table that keeps being updated and noticed
that after a few days, the disk usage has growned to
from just over 150 MB to like 2 GB !
I followed the recommendations from the various search
of the archives, changed the max_fsm_relations, pages,
keep doing vacuum like every minute while the
table of interest in being updated. I kept
watching the disk space usage and still noticed that
it continues to increase.
Looks like vacuum has no effect.
I did vacuum tablename and don't intend to use
the full option since it locks the table.
I have 7.3.3 running in Solaris 9.
Any recommendation ?
Thanks.
Gan
--
+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Seum-Lim GAN email : slgan(at)lucent(dot)com |
| Lucent Technologies |
| 2000 N. Naperville Road, 6B-403F tel : (630)-713-6665 |
| Naperville, IL 60566, USA. fax : (630)-713-7272 |
| web : http://inuweb.ih.lucent.com/~slgan |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Childs | 2003-10-13 09:23:07 | Re: Performance, vacuum and reclaiming space, fsm |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2003-10-13 09:04:44 | Re: One or more processor ? |