Re: Postgres on RAID5

From: PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
To: "Arshavir Grigorian" <ag(at)m-cam(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres on RAID5
Date: 2005-03-12 02:20:18
Message-ID: opsnh534mcth1vuj@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


Look for the possibility that a foreign key check might not be using an
index. This would yield a seq scan for each insertion, which might be your
problem.

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:22:56 -0500, Arshavir Grigorian <ag(at)m-cam(dot)com>
wrote:

> Many thanks for all the response.
>
> I guess there are a lot of things to change and tweak and I wonder what
> would be a good benchmarking sample dataset (size, contents).
>
> My tables are very large (the smallest is 7+ mil records) and take
> several days to load (if not weeks). It would be nice to have a sample
> dataset that would be large enough to mimic my large datasets, but small
> enough to load in a short priod of time. Any suggestions?
>
>
> Arshavir
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Kirpa 2005-03-12 02:21:29 Re: Postgres on RAID5
Previous Message PFC 2005-03-12 02:15:21 Re: Questions about 2 databases.