Re: Join efficiency

From: "Russ Brown" <postgres(at)dot4dot(dot)plus(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Join efficiency
Date: 2004-09-01 15:20:58
Message-ID: opsdnl88qzg2z5qo@relay.plus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:31:07 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "Russ Brown" <postgres(at)dot4dot(dot)plus(dot)com> writes:
>> Is there any difference between these queries in terms of the speed of
>> planning or the quality of the plan untimately used?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/explicit-joins.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/explicit-joins.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.2/static/explicit-joins.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.1/static/explicit-joins.html
>
> depending on which version you are using. (I think 7.1-7.3
> are essentially alike, but 7.4 is not.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Thanks for that: very informative.

I should have spotted that in the manual myself, though it has been nice
reading other people's opinions on the subject too.

Regards.

--

Russell Brown

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-09-01 15:24:21 Re: pg_autovacuum (7.4) nss_ldap oddity
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-09-01 15:20:00 Re: PostgreSQL and Fedora?