From: | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Web application: Programming language/Framework |
Date: | 2004-08-17 18:31:02 |
Message-ID: | opscv210fjcq72hf@musicbox |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
By "weak", I meant "lack of expressive power", not "weakly supported".
That PHP has a huge community is obvious. It's everywhere. The list of
broken things in PHP is too long to mention, just think about namespaces
for instance. I have no bad feelings towards people who use PHP, rather I
wonder why so many people waste their time with such a badly designed
tool. I did not intend to be discourteous, my excuses if I was, rather, I
wanted to help the OP out of the PHP mess.
I have had to code in PHP and always hated it.
I know this is off-topic so... snip.
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:15:18 -0300, Gustavo Franklin Nóbrega - PLANAE
<gfnobrega(at)planae(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> Off course PHP is a very weak language... Is than weak that SF.net have
> 9144 PHP projects and 3292 Python projects. Python is a very good
> language, but is discourteous (or that is a signal of knowledge lack) to
> speak that 'php is a very weak language', when knows that exist so many
> PHP programmers in this list. Futhermore, this subject is not part
> of this list.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-08-17 19:00:33 | (S)RPMS for 7.4.4 released. |
Previous Message | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud | 2004-08-17 18:22:44 | Re: Autoincremental value |