| From: | Malcolm Warren <malcolm(at)villeinitalia(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using oids |
| Date: | 2003-09-03 09:39:14 |
| Message-ID: | opruw3roxaoa2ek7@10.0.0.1 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:28:01 +0200, Bo Lorentsen <bl(at)netgroup(dot)dk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:10, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>
>> Yes. It is correct. As of 7.3.x and onwards oids are optional at table
>> creation times. They default to be available for new objects but that is
>> for backwards compatibility I believe. In future, they would default to
>> be not available for a particular object(hopefully). Right now you need
>> to explicitly specify no oids while creating tables etc.
The point about oids is that they are so useful that many people have used
them extensively, me included.
And I did so on the basis of a book written by Bruce Mowjian, one of
Postgresql's major contributors.
If we are saying that there will always be backwards compatibility then I
can sleep at night.
If we are saying that at some point oids will exist no more then all of a
sudden I am going to have to re-write an awful lot of code.
Malcolm Warren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amin Schoeib | 2003-09-03 09:44:30 | ERROR: PLPGSQL does not exist |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-09-03 09:38:23 | Re: Using oids |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bo Lorentsen | 2003-09-03 10:20:42 | Re: Using oids |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-09-03 09:38:23 | Re: Using oids |