From: | "Olivier Hubaut" <olivier(at)scmbb(dot)ulb(dot)ac(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Is it normal that functions are so much faster than inline queries |
Date: | 2004-03-31 12:28:10 |
Message-ID: | opr5qac8iq94ope3@olivier.amaze.ulb.ac.be |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
I'm doing some test on our PgSQL 7.3.4 and I can't believe what I see:
When I want to execute this set of queries in a function:
DELETE FROM oly.amaze_log_report WHERE batch = $1 ;
INSERT INTO oly.amaze_log_report
SELECT $1, 'DATA', 'MISSING_NEWREF_DECLARATION', 'ERROR', tmp.error_count,
'Missing NEW reference declaration for ' || tmp.class_name || '.' ||
tmp.feature_name FROM (
SELECT count (DISTINCT LDO.new_value) AS error_count, LDO.class AS
class_name, LDO.feature AS feature_name
FROM oly.amaze_log_database_object AS LDO
LEFT JOIN oly.amaze_log_object AS LO ON ((LO.batch, LO.id) =
(LDO.batch, LDO.new_value))
WHERE LDO.batch = $1 AND LO.batch IS NULL GROUP BY LDO.class,
LDO.feature
) AS tmp WHERE tmp.error_count > 0 ;
SELECT count(*) AS error_count FROM oly.amaze_log_report WHERE batch = $1;
It takes only 2 seconds.
But when I tried to do it directly in the psql term (replacing the $1
value with the same used in the function call), I'm obliged to kill the
second query after 10 minutes because it's still runnning!
I'm really wondering why the functions are so fast comparing to the
classical SQL statement. Any ideas?
--
Downloading signature ... 99%
*CRC FAILED*
signature aborted
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-31 15:33:20 | Re: Is it normal that functions are so much faster than inline queries |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-03-31 12:06:04 | Re: plpgsql vs. SQL in stored procedures |