From: | Joe Maldonado <jmaldonado(at)mail(dot)webehosting(dot)biz> |
---|---|
To: | Mitch Pirtle <mitchy(at)spacemonkeylabs(dot)com>, jmaldonado(at)mail(dot)webehosting(dot)biz |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: database clustering |
Date: | 2004-02-20 20:53:17 |
Message-ID: | opr3osa317xjk05d@mail.webehosting.biz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I have looked at this and this is not what I was looking for. Using this the application will need to figure out how to merge records. I was looking to be able to use something like the oracle syntax of host:database:schema:table within sql to service the queries.
-Joe
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:45:38 -0500, Mitch Pirtle <mitchy(at)spacemonkeylabs(dot)com> wrote:
> Joe Maldonado wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I am planning a postgres database cluster. Each database will be on it's own machine and I wanted to enable one as the frontend to the rest. This is so that applications do not need to know which database contains what data. Is there a way to configure postgres to communicate to other dbs via sql so as to be transparent to the user? I know this can be done in Oracle though I'd rather not go through that experience if I do not need to.
>
> Perhaps this is something that would benefit from the use of sql relay:
>
> http://sqlrelay.sourceforge.net/
>
> Very neat ideas, and might be another approach for your problem.
>
> -- Mitch
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeremy Smith | 2004-02-20 20:53:37 | Re: PosgreSQL hogging resources? |
Previous Message | V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] | 2004-02-20 20:38:29 | Re: problems with regressive tests on rh8.0 |