From: | John Turner <jjturner(at)energi(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL - The Best Overall Database |
Date: | 2015-08-13 14:28:36 |
Message-ID: | op.x3a85yqkk4admm@eis158.energi.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:46:49 -0400, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:21 AM, John McKown
<john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>
>>>> This should put a smile on all PostgreSQL DBA's faces.
>>
>> The Best Overall Database
>
> Very nice. Of course, I have a "thing" about both MS and Oracle. And
> not a good "thing", either.
> I uinderstand and agree. In like fashion, I have a large dislike for
> MySQL and Access. But then again, are either of them really >db's? :)
I must say that if it weren't for Access and their support community, I
wouldn't have been introduced to PostgreSQL (via my interest in the
temporal extensions some years back) -- and coming from the business side
of things, making the leap from Excel to Access many many moons ago served
as my paradigm 'relational database' moment. Suffice to say MS really
captured a niche with an all-in-one app/db. But yes, for a 'real'
enterprise database then it drops off the table of contenders ; )
- John
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-13 14:39:25 | Re: Chars problem restoring to ps 8.4 (utf8) a dumped db from ps 8.1 (latin9) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-13 14:20:54 | Re: SELECT blocks UPDATE |