From: | "Pierre C" <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Mario Splivalo" <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>, "Mladen Gogala" <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow |
Date: | 2010-12-01 21:43:08 |
Message-ID: | op.vm1096ukeorkce@apollo13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:24:35 +0100, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> There is a operating system which comes with a very decent extent
>> based file system and a defragmentation tool, included in the OS.
>> The file system is called "NTFS"
> Been there, done that. Not only was performance quite poor compared
> to Linux, but reliability and staff time to manage things suffered
> in comparison to Linux.
Please don't start with NTFS. It is the worst excuse for a filesystem I've
ever seen.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mario Splivalo | 2010-12-02 08:36:40 | Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow |
Previous Message | Mladen Gogala | 2010-12-01 21:07:35 | Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow |