From: | "Max Zorloff" <zorloff(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | adamtaunowilliams(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Shared memory usage |
Date: | 2007-08-27 13:18:19 |
Message-ID: | op.txpy8trnll0p5y@1-rtt202dnf3uds.mshome.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:21:43 +0400, Adam Tauno Williams
<adamtaunowilliams(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have a postgres 8.0 and ~400mb database with lots of simple selects
>> using indexes.
>> I've installed pgpool on the system. I've set num_init_children to 5 and
>> here is the top output.
>> One of postmasters is my demon running some insert/update tasks. I see
>> that they all use cpu heavily, but do not use the shared memory.
>> shared_buffers is set to 60000, yet they use a minimal part of that. I'd
>> like to know why won't they use more?
>
> This just looks like the output of top; what is telling you that
> PostgreSQL is not using the shared memory? Enable statistics collection
> and then look in pg_statio_user_tables.
I have it enabled. How can I tell whether the shared memory is used from
the information in this table?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph S | 2007-08-27 13:24:21 | Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE not considering primary and unique indices! |
Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2007-08-27 12:55:56 | Re: [ERROR] syntax error at end of input |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moran | 2007-08-27 13:29:35 | Re: Postgres performance problem |
Previous Message | GOERGLER Paul | 2007-08-27 13:11:57 | Bitmap Heap Scan before using index |