Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS

From: PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, "pgsql-general General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Date: 2007-05-31 21:36:32
Message-ID: op.ts7nm6mocigqcu@apollo13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:20:09 +0200, Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> wrote:

>
> On May 25, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> That's true at the level of DDL operations, but AFAIK we could
>> parallelize table-loading and index-creation steps pretty effectively
>> --- and that's where all the time goes.
>
> I would be happy with parallel builds of the indexes of a given table.
> That way you have just one scan of the whole table to build all its
> indexes.

Will the synchronized seq scan patch be able to do this by issuing all
the CREATE INDEX commands at the same time from several different database
connections ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PFC 2007-05-31 21:46:00 Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Previous Message Ray Stell 2007-05-31 21:33:03 Re: jdbc pg_hba.conf error