| From: | PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres Benchmark Results |
| Date: | 2007-05-28 06:41:51 |
| Message-ID: | op.ts0x71w7cigqcu@apollo13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 28 May 2007 05:53:16 +0200, Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I am re-running it with other tuning, notably cost-based vacuum
>> delay and less frequent checkpoints, and it is a *lot* smoother.
>> These take a full night to run, so I'll post more results when I
>> have usefull stuff to show.
>> This has proven to be a very interesting trip to benchmarkland...
>
> [ rather late in my reply but I had to ]
>
> Are you tuning mysql in a similar fashion ?
Well, the tuning knobs are different, there are no check points or
vacuum... but yes I tried to tune MySQL too, but the hardest part was
simply making it work without deadlocking continuously.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2007-05-28 12:45:38 | PITR performance costs |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2007-05-28 03:53:16 | Re: Postgres Benchmark Results |