| From: | PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
| Date: | 2005-09-30 21:45:10 |
| Message-ID: | op.sxxqpkrcth1vuj@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> Bulk loading speed is irrelevant here - that is dominated by parsing,
> which
> we have covered copiously (har har) previously and have sped up by 500%,
> which still makes Postgres < 1/2 the loading speed of MySQL.
Let's ask MySQL 4.0
> LOAD DATA INFILE blah
0 errors, 666 warnings
> SHOW WARNINGS;
not implemented. upgrade to 4.1
duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-30 22:08:19 | Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2005-09-30 21:40:41 | Re: postgresql clustering |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-09-30 22:21:16 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-09-30 21:31:32 | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |