Re: 9.5 "chained equality" behavior

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.5 "chained equality" behavior
Date: 2017-05-30 21:00:29
Message-ID: ogkmh8$mj4$1@blaine.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joshua Ma schrieb am 30.05.2017 um 22:56:
> We're going to fix usages of this to
> instead do (a = b && a = c) instead of (a = b = c).

That has to be (a = b AND a = c)

The && operator is not valid for booleans

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chiru r 2017-05-30 21:06:53 Access Management question
Previous Message Joshua Ma 2017-05-30 20:56:02 9.5 "chained equality" behavior