From: | "Lee Crampton" <lee(at)avbrief(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Setting up MAKE file for Postgres and C++/Newbie question |
Date: | 2001-11-25 11:54:20 |
Message-ID: | o_4M7.9029$i37.1242397@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
A make file can be very simple indeed. These days makefiles have become
almost incomprehensible to all but a few!
If you don't want to be flexible and portable in the extreme, a simple
makefile for the current directory for any project goes like this:
--------------------------------------
INC="/pathFor/Other/Includes"
foo : foo.o
gcc -o foo foo.o
foo.o : foo.c
gcc -c foo.c -I $(INC);
--------------------------------------
Some years ago I wrote a program makemake which created makefiles based on
the contents of the current dir.
It was for a DOS based system but should work anywhere (with perhaps a
couple of tweeks).
I will see if I can dig it out.
Hope this helps.
Lee Crampton
<shield123321(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote in message
news:0OtL7(dot)43114$gQ1(dot)17272737(at)news1(dot)elmhst1(dot)il(dot)home(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
> I've found, compiled and tested the libpq++ c++ program examples. I've
even
> modified them to work with my database. Now I want to take an existing
> program written in c++ and add the postgres classes. I also want to do
this
> in my working directory, not the samples directory. The make file with
the
> examples is pretty intense. Does anyone have a simpler version that will
> set the appropriate paths for the includes? I naturally want to use the
> header files included with postgres, not copy them around.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Pilsl | 2001-11-25 14:28:57 | Re: anyone knows about pam_pgsql ? |
Previous Message | charles | 2001-11-25 07:25:14 | how to reduce checkpoint time? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-25 17:13:42 | Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector |
Previous Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2001-11-25 08:35:52 | Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector |