| From: | blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr |
|---|---|
| To: | dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk |
| Cc: | pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de, jm(at)poure(dot)com, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Desktop integration |
| Date: | 2003-09-02 20:42:30 |
| Message-ID: | mnet1.1062528150.8060.blacknoz@club-internet.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave,
concerning this last point, let's stay as we are. I finally had a look to debian postgresql-client package and it creates a "Databases" entry in debian menu. So it seems to be the right place for debian menus at this time. I'll also have a look to gnome/kde/unified desktop specification and registered sections when I'll have the time for it... For the moment I'm building the beta2 :)
Cheers,
Raphaël
>> Sounds good to me, but then may be we should leave it in
>> "tools" instead
>> of "databases" entry. Although I prefer "Databases", "tools" is a
>> section I found from a scratch install it was not the case of
>> "databases" which I added by hand. What do you think ?
>
>Hmm, I have neither on KDE 3.1 on Slackware 9. Closest I have is Development. Thoughts anyone? Should it be standardised or distro specific?
>
>Regards, Dave.
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-03 08:25:19 | Re: Desktop integration |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-02 15:27:58 | pgAdmin 3 0.9.2 (BETA 2) source packaged |