From: | Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during |
Date: | 2004-03-21 17:35:37 |
Message-ID: | mjqoeqqnlw6.fsf@cs.berkeley.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> writes:
>> The bigger problem though with this is that it makes the
>> problem of list overflow much worse. The hard part about
>> shared memory management is not so much that the available
>> space is small, as that the available space is fixed --- we
>> can't easily change it after postmaster start. The more finely
Again, I can suggest the shared memory MemoryContext we use in
TelegraphCQ that is based on the OSSP libmm memory manager. We use it
to grow and shrink shared memory at will.
--
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arthur Ward | 2004-03-21 17:48:26 | Re: Unbalanced Btree Indices ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-21 17:23:39 | Re: [HACKERS] listening addresses |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-22 04:17:36 | Re: xlog.c timezone name size |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2004-03-17 15:59:22 | Re: shutdown problems on win32 |