Re: Reverse Key Index

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reverse Key Index
Date: 2015-02-26 11:45:46
Message-ID: mcn11a$lf8$1@ger.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Sven R. Kunze schrieb am 26.02.2015 um 12:04:
> I just thought about btree indexes here mainly because they well-known and well-used in ORM frameworks.

If your ORM framework needs to know about the internals of an index definition or even requires a certain index type, then you should ditch that ORM framework.

Apart from indexes supporting business constraints (e.g. a unique index) neither the application nor the the ORM framework should care about indexes at all.

> does PostgreSQL support the concept of reverse key indexing as described here?

The real question is: why do you think you need such an index?
Do you have any performance problems with the existing BTree index? If yes, which problem exactly?

Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven R. Kunze 2015-02-26 12:23:33 Re: Reverse Key Index
Previous Message Sven R. Kunze 2015-02-26 11:04:01 Re: Reverse Key Index