Re: DBD::Pg vs Pg.pm

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: "Culley Harrelson" <Culley_Harrelson(at)pgn(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DBD::Pg vs Pg.pm
Date: 2001-11-15 01:27:09
Message-ID: m3zo5oddsi.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Culley Harrelson" <Culley_Harrelson(at)pgn(dot)com> writes:

> Are there any significance performance differences between DBD::Pg and going
> directly to Pg.pm.  I wasn't even aware that there was a difference till I
> recently...  The interface difference between the two are drastic.

I wouldn't imagine that there's much of a difference. The main
advantage of the DBD module is that it fits into the DBI framework
which uses a common interface for many different databases. So if you
had a Perl script using a proprietary database through DBI, you could
convert it fairly easily to use Postgres (depending on how much
non-standard SQL and server-side stuff you were doing).

DBI is the "recommended" way to use databases from Perl but Pg.pm
works fine AFIAK.

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-11-15 01:33:15 Re: Sourceforge on Oracle?
Previous Message Risko Peter 2001-11-15 01:15:54 Re: index on numbers not honoured