Re: Huge pg_toast table

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Huge pg_toast table
Date: 2003-07-24 21:03:43
Message-ID: m3znj3skls.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:

> On Thursday July 24 2003 2:53, Ed L. wrote:
> > I have a frequently updated table called 'audit' with 10,000 rows of
> > about 90kb per row (90kb * 10k = 900mb). There is a 35gb system table
> > called pg_toast_NNNNN where NNNNN is the oid of the 'audit' table.
> >
> > My question: should I expect a 'vacuum full' to shrink the size of this
> > pg_toast table? I ask instead of just doing it because doing so would
> > require scheduling customer downtime since 'vacuum full' blocks access.
>
> BTW, we currently run 'analyze' every 2 hours and vacuum once daily on this
> 7.3.2 cluster....

You might want to check your FSM (free space map) settings--it sounds
like you're losing track of some pages that (non-blocking) vacuum
could salvage, saving you from having to VACUUM FULL. There's been a
fair amount of discussion about FSM tuning if you check the
archives...

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2003-07-24 21:06:12 Re: dump_all/restore times?
Previous Message Ed L. 2003-07-24 20:59:35 Re: Huge pg_toast table