Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Kyle <kyle(at)ccidomain(dot)com>
Cc: Forum - Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues
Date: 2003-04-10 16:25:45
Message-ID: m3wui2gvzq.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kyle <kyle(at)ccidomain(dot)com> writes:

> Shridhar has a good point using nice. I know RedHat supports nice
> because I have installed a totally background program that uses "nice
> 19" as part of its command line.

He's talking about honoring 'nice' for I/O scheduling, which is
in addition to the standard modification of CPU priority. Linux
doesn't currently do this in 2.4--it was discussed for 2.5 but I don't
know if it has gone in yet.

-Doug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Fraser 2003-04-10 16:31:19 Re: Arrays ... need clarification....
Previous Message Amir Becher 2003-04-10 16:22:05 Corrupt index