From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bruc(at)acm(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-05-02 23:44:42 |
Message-ID: | m3vgnjl3it.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) writes:
> I have been using PostgreSQL and XFS file systems on SGI's for many
> years, and PostgreSQL is fast. Dumping and loading 100GB of table
> files takes less than one day elapsed (provided there is no other
> activity on that database -- large amounts of transactional activity
> will slow things down). I always turn off fsync.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Then your performance numbers are largely useless for those of us that
like our data. ;)
The point at issue is the performance of fsync() on journaling
filesystems...
-Doug
--
The rain man gave me two cures; he said jump right in,
The first was Texas medicine--the second was just railroad gin,
And like a fool I mixed them, and it strangled up my mind,
Now people just get uglier, and I got no sense of time... --Dylan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-02 23:51:04 | Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-02 23:19:04 | Re: Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes |