Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: bruc(at)acm(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-05-02 23:44:42
Message-ID: m3vgnjl3it.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) writes:

> I have been using PostgreSQL and XFS file systems on SGI's for many
> years, and PostgreSQL is fast. Dumping and loading 100GB of table
> files takes less than one day elapsed (provided there is no other
> activity on that database -- large amounts of transactional activity
> will slow things down). I always turn off fsync.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Then your performance numbers are largely useless for those of us that
like our data. ;)

The point at issue is the performance of fsync() on journaling
filesystems...

-Doug
--
The rain man gave me two cures; he said jump right in,
The first was Texas medicine--the second was just railroad gin,
And like a fool I mixed them, and it strangled up my mind,
Now people just get uglier, and I got no sense of time... --Dylan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-02 23:51:04 Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-02 23:19:04 Re: Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes